​Comprehensive Case Study project

Comprehensive Case Study project

General Guidelines for Comprehensive Case Study

Please follow instruction. APA style use the Soap note template case study information to create a comprehensive evaluation of the patient.

Please you continued the Comprehensive SOAP note on the same template, which I sent to you as an attachment at the empty space below, and then major research and discussion of the disease process are presented.

This case study should be a summative evaluation supported by a minimum of 5 evidence-based articles. No older, than 5 years old.

Provide references for the plan, no older than 5 years old.

Evaluation of the case study should be no more than 3-4 substantive paragraphs. A minimum of five evidence-based sources should be used for your case study.

Please do not use No secondary sources are allowed, ie, Medscape, Up to Date, etc.

Analyze quality and relevance of S + O data and the evidence for diagnosis. Use of clinical evidence based reasoning and literature to describe the plan of care.

B) Discuss and define and give rational of the diagnosis, 3Differential Diagnosis and Plan of treatment.

3Differential Diagnosis

Acts of Omission (Child Neglect): (T74.02XA)

Blunt abdominal trauma (Y04.8):

SEPSIS (A41.9):

Primary diagnosis: ICD-10 Codes: Acts of Commission (Child Abuse): (T74.12):

Please provide me with a Comprehensive SOAP Note and Growth Chart base on the patient Weight, height and BMI.

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction: The Comprehensive Case Study project requires students to evaluate a patient and create a SOAP note using APA style. The evaluation should be supported by a minimum of five evidence-based articles no older than five years old, and the plan should include references no older than five years old. In addition, the student must analyze quality and relevance of S + O data and the evidence for diagnosis using clinical evidence-based reasoning and literature. The student should also discuss and define the diagnosis, 3 Differential Diagnosis and Plan of treatment.

A) The evaluation should include an analysis of the quality and relevance of S + O data and the evidence for diagnosis using clinical evidence-based reasoning and literature to describe the plan of care. This requires a deep understanding of the patient’s condition and knowledge of current medical practices. Students should use a minimum of five evidence-based sources for their case study.

B) To discuss and define the diagnosis, 3 Differential Diagnosis, and Plan of treatment, students need to analyze the patient’s symptoms and identify the potential causes. In this case, the Differential Diagnosis includes Acts of Omission (Child Neglect), Blunt abdominal trauma, SEPSIS, and Acts of Commission (Child Abuse). The student should provide a detailed explanation of each of these diagnoses and explain why they have chosen the primary diagnosis of Acts of Commission (Child Abuse). Finally, the plan of treatment should also be discussed, highlighting evidence-based practices and referencing sources no older than five years old.

In addition, students are required to provide a Comprehensive SOAP Note and Growth Chart based on the patient’s Weight, height, and BMI. The SOAP note should be provided on a template, and the student should follow APA style guidelines for formatting and citation. The Growth Chart should be based on the patient’s physical measurements and should provide a visual representation of their progress.

Table of Contents

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

Strategy and Business Models Exercise

In this assignment, students will apply the concepts of business models and strategies to a real company. Students will have the opportunity to assess why

New questions

SEU Risk Assessment Tools Discussion

Reply to this post: Examine the quality improvement that occurred, including the background and the process changes. Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are commonly seen in patients

SEU Tertiary Hospital Discussion

Examination of the Quality improvement The available pharmacists’ roles are thought to have evolved dramatically during the last few decades. The general public believes that

Discussion 3

Key objective 2 in the Health Sector Transformation Program within Saudi Vision 2030 is improving the quality and efficiency of health services.   Discuss two

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!