Because of the great differences between HIT systems and different

  

Because of the great differences between HIT systems and different goals of an evaluation, there is no one-size-fits-all evaluation plan. Different technologies require different evaluation methods. Consequently, in this part of the Evaluation Plan Project, there is a need to conduct research on how system implementations prevent errors, enhance the quality, and efficiency of health systems. Select one research goal and viewpoint to use in the evaluation.

In a 3- to 4-page documentation:

· Identify which of the cases from the text, will be evaluated in this project, summarize the case, and explain why the selected system featured in the case.

· Next, summarize your three research findings on similar HIT implementations. Include the models, evaluation methods, findings, and plans for reevaluation in each article.

· Critique the HIT implementations: Identify successful and unsuccessful elements of the implementations. Explain the reasons for the successful elements. Identify areas for improvement and explain why (or how) they could be improved.

· Create an evaluation goal and identify the viewpoint related to the goal that will guide your own evaluation plan. Provide a rationale for choosing that goal and viewpoint.

Reference

Abbasi-moghaddam, M. A., Zarei, E., Bagherzadeh, R., Dargahi, H., & Farrokhi, P. (2019). Evaluation of service quality from patients’ viewpoint. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi:10.1186/s12913-019-3998-0

Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023

Brender, J. (2006). Handbook of evaluation methods for health informatics. Elsevier Academic Press

Carayon, P., Smith, P., Hundt, A., Kuruchittham, V., & Li, Q. (2009). Implementation of an electronic health records system in a small clinic: the viewpoint of clinic staff. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290701628178

Cho, H. Yen, P. Dowding, D., Merril, J., & Schnall, R. (2018, October). A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 86, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.08.012

Hamann, D. J., & Bezboruah, K. C. (2020). Outcomes of health information technology utilization in nursing homes: Do implementation processes matter? Health Informatics Journal, 26(3), 2249–2264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219899556

Huang, Y.-H., & Gramopadhye, A. K. (2016). Recommendations for health information technology implementation in rural hospitals. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance (09526862), 29(4), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2015-0115

Table of Contents

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

St. Thomas University Losartan Presentation

Drug PowerPoint Presentation For this assignment, you will select a drug from the list below and create a PowerPoint Presentation.  Metformin Losartan Amoxicillin Lisinopril Albuterol

Number 4.

Payments for Health Services Providers (125 points) Insurance is based on pooling of losses, payment for random losses, risk transfer, and indemnification. As a result,

New questions

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!